Society's Relationship With Technology

Growing Up in a Tech Dependent World

Growing up in a society heavily reliant on technology is both a blessing and a curse. Technology is EVERYWHERE, including: social lives, education, entertainment, smartphones, social media, and constant connectivity between individuals. While technology offers endless opportunities for learning and creativity, it also comes with challenges that are unique to this digital time.

Social Interactions in the Digital Age

Childhood no longer revolves around playgrounds or backyards but often takes place in virtual spaces like social media and video games. Friendships are maintained through things like Snapchat streaks, online gaming, and video calls, creating a barrier between face-to-face interactions. While these tools allow for global connections, they can also lead to something referred to as "digital loneliness." Where online interactions fail to replace real-life relationships.

Social media also brings unprecedented levels of pressure. Teens often compare their lives to carefully hand-picked reels of their peers, which can lead to feelings of insecurity and "FOMO" (Fear of Missing Out). The constant need to compare oneself to others can have a lasting impact on self-esteem and mental health.

Education Revolutionized

Technology has impacted education in several ways in the digital space, offering students access to a world of knowledge. Certain platforms like YouTube and Khan Academy provide resources for learning everything from coding to creative arts. Other apps such as DuoLingo and Google Translate also help teach children other languages and are extremely useful. During the COVID-19 pandemic, online education proved the power of technology but also exposed divides, with some students lacking reliable internet or devices.

While technology makes education more dynamic and accessible, it may limit the development of real-world problem-solving and face-to-face collaboration skills.

Entertainment and Creativity

Entertainment is easier than ever to access. With platforms like Netflix, YouTube, and TikTok, boredom doesn't exist. These platforms provide personalized streams of content that can be both inspiring and addictive, rewiring the brain to crave instant gratification through dopamine.

The role of kids in media has also changed. They are no longer just consumers, but creators. Young people are producing content that reaches wide audiences in many forms including TikTok dances and YouTube content. This is an incredible way to develop creativity, but also introduces challenges like cyberbullying, the pressure to go viral, and the pursuit of likes and views.

Family Dynamics and Screen Time

Technology has also changed family dynamics in the recent generations. A "normal" family dinner now often includes phones or other electronic devices at the table. Parents struggle to set boundaries for their kids while trying to maintain healthy tech habits themselves.

Despite this, technology also brings families together. Certain activities like watching shows, playing games, or sending funny memes can create new forms of bonding between family members. 

Impact on Mental Health

Technology’s influence on mental health has both positive and negative effects. While certain mental health apps like Headspace promote mindfulness and online communities provide support, the constant stream of notifications, news, and social comparisons can heighten anxiety and depression (especially in young adults).

Growing up with technology isn’t necessarily good or bad, it’s just different. With awareness of how technology can affect you, young people can use technology in ways that enhance their lives and prepare them for the future.

Antiwar.com And Mainstream Media

When it comes to U.S. foreign policy, anti-war opinions are normally hard to find compared to pro-war stories in mainstream media. However, websites like Antiwar.com and The American Conservative show a much more diverse conversation happening outside of traditional news sources. These sites push for avoiding military conflicts and protecting personal freedoms. This raises important questions about why we don’t hear more anti-war views in a society that often leans towards supporting military conflicts.

Antiwar.com is pretty straightforward in its mission. It aims to limit U.S. military intervention worldwide. By providing a space for people that challenge military entanglement, it brings a range of perspectives into the national conversation. The American Conservative also questions unchecked government power and promotes personal rights. Both sites reflect lively debates about U.S. military policies but often get overlooked in mainstream news, leaving us to wonder why these perspectives stay under the radar.

A big part of the problem is that the government heavily influences public opinion. In a time where military action is commonly framed as essential to national security, pro-peace perspectives are usually left to the side. Government interests in keeping up a pro-war narrative are powerful, and many media outlets support this. This makes it challenging for platforms like Antiwar.com and The American Conservative to gain visibility since their viewpoints often challenge that of the government.

There is also the common belief that the U.S. is naturally pro-war, which complicates the topic. Many Americans view military interventions as justified, reinforcing support for these actions and shaping debates around what’s best for national security. This leaves anti-war opinions looking “unpatriotic” or “too idealistic.” Keeping anti-war voices out of the spotlight allows public perception to mirror the government’s narrative.

Ultimately, the lack of visibility for anti-war sites reflects a complicated controversy of political, economic, and social forces. By giving platforms like Antiwar.com and The American Conservative more attention, we would be able to see a wider variety of opinions in foreign policy discussions, which are essential for a well-rounded view on how the U.S. approaches global issues.

EOTO #2 Reax: Propaganda

Propaganda in the U.S: A Tool for Influence

Propaganda is a powerful tool that molds the perception and opinions of the public. The presence of propaganda in the United States has developed significantly over the years. While often associated with authoritarian societies, propaganda can be found in democratic societies as well. It is used to influence citizens on anything from public health to foreign policy.

Throughout history, the U.S. government has used propaganda during times of crisis, such as World War I and World War II. The Committee on Public Information, which was formed in 1917, was one of the first major government propaganda efforts. It aimed to boost enlistment and support for the war through posters, films, and speeches, displaying the enemy as a threat to democracy and the freedom that America holds so close.

In current times, propaganda has adapted to new media and technology. The rise of social media has given access to the government to reach audiences more directly and efficiently. For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the government utilized various forms of communication to promote vaccinations and safety measures. Campaigns featuring celebrities, healthcare professionals, and community leaders, were designed to influence public behavior and urge vaccinations.

However, the effectiveness of propaganda is often aligned with existing beliefs. This is where the concept of confirmation bias comes into play. Individuals are more likely to accept information that reinforces their pre-existing views. Because of this, propaganda can polarize public opinion, creating echo chambers where misinformation flourishes.

In addition, the use of propaganda raises ethical questions. While it can be used for good, it can also be misused to manipulate, mislead, or silence dissent. As citizens, it is essential to stay aware of this, evaluating the information presented by the government and recognizing the motivations behind it.

In an age controlled by the media, understanding propaganda's role is crucial for our society. 

EOTO #2 : The Twitter Files & Government Censorship

Government Censorship and "The Twitter Files"

In a time where information gets around extremely fast, the use of government censorship has become increasingly more evident. Government censorship is the restriction or suppression of speech, communication, or information. Government censorship aims to control public discourse and maintain power. The backside of government censorship has been exposed with the release of "The Twitter Files," a series of internal documents concerning free speech, transparency, and the role of social media in democracy and our society.

What Are "The Twitter Files"?

In 2022, Elon Musk made headlines by releasing what is known as "The Twitter Files." These documents reveal the background interactions between Twitter and the government, exposing how decisions regarding content moderation are made. The files include internal communications and policies that highlight the relationship between social media platforms and the government.

Moderation and Government Influence

One of the primary themes from "The Twitter Files" is the enforcement of content moderation policies. The documents reveal that certain government agencies have made requests to Twitter for the moderation of specific accounts and types of content. This raises significant questions and concerns about the extent to which the government influences social media operations. 

Findings of Government Requests

The files present overwhelming evidence that various government entities have sought to influence Twitter's moderation practices. These circumstances of direct communication between Twitter and the government reveal a troubling dynamic. Requests were made to suppress certain topics, including information related to COVID-19 and election-related posts. These suppressions portray a broader concern: the possibility of government overreach to controlling public discourse.

Censorship Examples in the Real-World

The release of these documents has brought attention to certain cases of account suspensions and content removals. The suppression of specific ideas not only affects the individuals involved but also has widespread effects on public knowledge and awareness. When certain perspectives are silenced, a distorted understanding of critical issues is created which further complicates the idea of free expression.

Impact on Free Speech

One of the most important problems regarding "The Twitter Files" is its impact on free speech. The documents raise alarming questions about the balance between content moderation and government censorship. While moderation is essential for maintaining a safe online environment, excessive censorship can lead to a block of open discourse. Users may even hold back from sharing their own perspectives out of fear of backlash or removal. This outcome interrupts the diverse ideas that are essential in a democracy.

Trust in Social Media

The documents also bring up the growing concerns about transparency and accountability within social media platforms. As users, it is our job to be aware of how much influence the government actually has over the media. A situation like this calls for clearer policies and oversight. Our society's trust in social media heavily relies on the belief that these platforms are operating with full transparency, without influence from external sources.

Conclusion: The Ongoing Debate

The ongoing controversy surrounding government censorship and "The Twitter Files" helps draw the line between protecting users and suppressing free speech. As social media continues to play a major role in our society's public relations, it is essential to ensure that these platforms are adhering to free speech and dialogue.

The Age of AI

 

The Rise of AI in Everyday Life: Reflections from In the Age of AI

After watching the documentary, In the Age of AI, I gained new perspective on how rapidly artificial intelligence (AI) has become a part of our daily lives. The video highlighted an extensive use of AI in China, in where it AI is prominent in their everyday lives.

One of the most shocking things was to see that China has replaced credit cards and now uses facial recognition for everyday purchases and payments. This raises serious concerns about privacy and control, as well as the potential impact it may have on banking industries in the United States. If this technology becomes more common here, it could lead to significant job losses and disrupt entire sectors of the economy. Although convenient, facial recognition payments could come at the cost of individual freedoms and privacy.

Another shocking aspect of China’s use of AI is its application in public surveillance. In particular, how AI is used to identify and fine jaywalkers. This contributes to China’s social credit system, where individuals are assigned scores based on their public behavior. A high score results in perks like discounts while a low score could lead to punishments such as being banned from public transportation. While I can the benefits of creating a more orderly society, this is deeply concerning in regards to personal privacy and government overreach. The thought of being constantly monitored by AI is unsettling to say the least.

Overall, AI has the potential to change the world as we know it. The potential is limitless, but includes facial recognition, gaming, and even self-driving vehicles. Despite this, AI also raises important questions about the long-term impact on privacy, job displacement, and social control. AI is a powerful tool, but its integration into our lives requires careful consideration of the implications it may have on society as a whole.

Twitter's Transformation Through Diffusion Theory

Twitter’s Transformation Through Diffusion Theory

Twitter, one of the most influential social media platforms of modern times, has undergone significant transformations since its creation in 2006. Its journey from a simple SMS site to a global communications tool can be understood through the Diffusion of Innovations Theory, developed by sociologist Everett Rogers. This theory explains how new ideas and technologies popularize over time. This theory is categorized into five stages: innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards. 

Innovators:

In 2006, Jack Dorsey and a small team of his co-workers created Twitter as a side project at Odeo, which was a podcasting company. At this time, Twitter was only recognized by innovators, which were the early stage testers of the platform. In these early days, Twitter had a small but dedicated group of users who saw its potential as a real-time communication avenue.

Early Adopters:

By 2007, early adopters began picking up Twitter for its ability to share information quickly and concisely. This group included journalists and activists who used the platform during events to coordinate protests and relay information in real-time. Political discussions, movements, and news began to shape the platform’s uses beyond personal messaging. Early adopters saw Twitter as a new way to participate in conversations about global issues, politics, and current events, giving the platform more attention.

Early Majority: 

The early majority came to Twitter in the years that followed, especially in the late 2000s and early 2010s. Businesses, media outlets, and celebrities joined the platform to engage with customers and fans directly. Twitter’s user base grew rapidly and it became a vital tool for marketing, customer service, and news. The introduction of features like hashtags and trending topics made Twitter even more accessible and appealing to new users. 

Late Majority: 

The late majority began adopting Twitter as it became more prominent in everyday life. By this point, Twitter had evolved from a small SMS site to a major platform. However, this period also brought problems such as misinformation and abuse of the platform.

Laggards: 

In 2022, Twitter was acquired by Elon Musk. Musk rebranded Twitter to "X" and began incorporating technologies like artificial intelligence. The laggards are anyone that is currently hopping on board as Twitter has already surpassed its late majority phase of the Diffusion Theory.

The Diffusion Theory shows how Twitter’s growth and transformation has undergone early stage phases to a globally used middle. 

Carrier Pigeons: An Innovative Method of Communication

 

The Invention and Use of Carrier Pigeons: Long-Distance Communication

The carrier pigeon was a remarkable tool for communication. Although Cyrus the Great of Persia is often credited with inventing the system of using pigeons for messaging, evidence of pigeons carrying messages goes as far back as 2000 BC in Mesopotamia. These birds had a pivotal role in overcoming the challenges of long-distance communication.

Early Methods of Communication

Before carrier pigeons, long-distance communication relied on other methods such as: smoke signals and balloon mail. However, these methods were very limited and unreliable. The need for a faster and more efficient way of delivering messages became clear as civilizations grew more.

Carrier Pigeons: A Revolutionary Solution

By the early 1800s, carrier pigeons became a widely used tool in warfare, commerce, and navigation. Their homing ability allowed them to consistently return to their home base after being released from far-off locations, making them an essential tool for communication during emergencies and wars. Unlike human messengers, pigeons could cover long distances quickly and accurately, solving the problem of slow and inefficient communication.

Lifesaving Roles in War

Carrier pigeons played an especially crucial role during World War I and World War II. One of the most famous pigeons, Cher Ami (French for "dear friend"), saved nearly 200 soldiers during World War I. Despite being wounded, Cher Ami successfully delivered a critical message across enemy lines when other communication methods had failed. These birds often provided a lifeline to troops on the front lines.

Impact and Limitations of Messenger Pigeons

While carrier pigeons were highly reliable due to their strong homing ability, they also had their setbacks. Their range was limited, which required conveying systems for longer messages. Not to mention that pigeons were vulnerable to disease outbreaks that could kill off their populations, disrupting communication. Training these birds also required time and included the risk of miscommunication if a pigeon became poorly trained.

Despite these limitations, carrier pigeons were an innovative and effective communication tool for centuries, providing a reliable solution to long-distance communication before modern-day technology came to be.